0.00/0.03	% Problem  : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.00/0.05	% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.11/0.37	% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
0.11/0.37	% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
0.11/0.37	% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.11/0.37	% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
0.11/0.37	% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
0.11/0.37	% CPULimit : 1440
0.11/0.37	% WCLimit  : 180
0.11/0.37	% DateTime : Mon Jul 27 09:32:52 UTC 2026
0.11/0.38	% CPUTime  : 
0.11/0.38	Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM
0.15/0.45	Running higher-order theorem proving
0.24/0.59	Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p
0.34/0.86	% Version: 3.5.1-ho
0.34/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.34/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.34/0.86	% Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting ehoh_best_sine with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% full_lambda_6 with pid 1197884 completed with status 0
0.34/0.86	% Result found by full_lambda_6
0.34/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.34/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.34/0.86	% Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.34/0.86	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.34/0.86	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DSFFFFBN
0.34/0.86	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.34/0.86	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% SubtermCWHack with pid 1197886 completed with status 0
0.34/0.86	% Result found by SubtermCWHack
0.34/0.86	% Preprocessing class: HSLMSMSMSSMNSFA.
0.34/0.86	% Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total)
0.34/0.86	% Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 900s (5) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting ehoh_best_sine_rwall with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% Starting full_lambda_6 with 180s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true))
0.34/0.86	% SinE strategy is GSinE(CountTerms,hypos,4,,4,20000,1.0,true)
0.34/0.86	% Search class: HGHSM-FSLM31-DSFFFFBN
0.34/0.86	% Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total)
0.34/0.86	% Starting SubtermCWHack with 17s (1) cores
0.34/0.86	% Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
0.34/0.86	
0.34/0.86	% Proof found!
0.34/0.86	% SZS status Theorem
0.34/0.86	% SZS output start CNFRefutation
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort1, type, set_Product_prod_b_b: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort2, type, b: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort3, type, set_b: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort4, type, product_prod_b_b: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort5, type, a: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_sort6, type, labeled_graph_a_b: $tType).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_28, type, equiv_equiv_b: set_b > set_Product_prod_b_b > $o).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_38, type, getRel_a_b: a > labeled_graph_a_b > set_Product_prod_b_b).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_50, type, labeled_vertices_a_b: labeled_graph_a_b > set_b).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_134, type, product_Pair_b_b: b > b > product_prod_b_b).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_149, type, refl_on_b: set_b > set_Product_prod_b_b > $o).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_150, type, sym_b: set_Product_prod_b_b > $o).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_158, type, trans_b: set_Product_prod_b_b > $o).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_220, type, member1285940496od_b_b: product_prod_b_b > set_Product_prod_b_b > $o).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_225, type, g: labeled_graph_a_b).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_226, type, i: a).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_228, type, y: b).
0.34/0.86	thf(decl_229, type, z: b).
0.34/0.86	thf(fact_264_equivE, axiom, ![X5:set_b, X6:set_Product_prod_b_b]:(((equiv_equiv_b @ X5 @ X6)=>~(((refl_on_b @ X5 @ X6)=>((sym_b @ X6)=>~((trans_b @ X6))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p', fact_264_equivE)).
0.34/0.86	thf(conj_0, conjecture, (member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ z @ y) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p', conj_0)).
0.34/0.86	thf(fact_251_symD, axiom, ![X6:set_Product_prod_b_b, X409:b, X410:b]:((((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X410 @ X409) @ X6)<=(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X409 @ X410) @ X6))<=(sym_b @ X6))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p', fact_251_symD)).
0.34/0.86	thf(fact_4_eq, axiom, (equiv_equiv_b @ (labeled_vertices_a_b @ g) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p', fact_4_eq)).
0.34/0.86	thf(fact_1_aI, axiom, (member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ y @ z) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.DGZxdwvMDc/E---3.1_1197869.p', fact_1_aI)).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X5:set_b, X6:set_Product_prod_b_b]:(((equiv_equiv_b @ X5 @ X6)=>~(((refl_on_b @ X5 @ X6)=>((sym_b @ X6)=>~(trans_b @ X6)))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_264_equivE])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ~((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ z @ y) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X6:set_Product_prod_b_b, X409:b, X410:b]:(((sym_b @ X6)=>((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X409 @ X410) @ X6)=>(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X410 @ X409) @ X6)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_251_symD])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1501:set_b, X1502:set_Product_prod_b_b]:((((refl_on_b @ X1501 @ X1502)|~(equiv_equiv_b @ X1501 @ X1502))&(((sym_b @ X1502)|~(equiv_equiv_b @ X1501 @ X1502))&((trans_b @ X1502)|~(equiv_equiv_b @ X1501 @ X1502))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])])])])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ z @ y) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1576:set_Product_prod_b_b, X1577:b, X1578:b]:((~(sym_b @ X1576)|(~(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X1577 @ X1578) @ X1576)|(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X1578 @ X1577) @ X1576)))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])])])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X5:set_b, X6:set_Product_prod_b_b]:(((sym_b @ X6)|~((equiv_equiv_b @ X5 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_12, plain, (equiv_equiv_b @ (labeled_vertices_a_b @ g) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_4_eq])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ~(member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ z @ y) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X9:b, X8:b, X6:set_Product_prod_b_b]:(((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X9 @ X8) @ X6)|~((sym_b @ X6))|~((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ X8 @ X9) @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_15, plain, (member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ y @ z) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_aI])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_16, plain, (sym_b @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ~((member1285940496od_b_b @ (product_Pair_b_b @ z @ y) @ (getRel_a_b @ i @ g))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13])).
0.34/0.86	thf(c_0_18, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])]), c_0_17]), ['proof']).
0.34/0.86	% SZS output end CNFRefutation
0.34/0.86	% Parsed axioms                        : 639
0.34/0.86	% Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 398
0.34/0.86	% Initial clauses                      : 363
0.34/0.86	% Removed in clause preprocessing      : 18
0.34/0.86	% Initial clauses in saturation        : 345
0.34/0.86	% Processed clauses                    : 1254
0.34/0.86	% ...of these trivial                  : 50
0.34/0.86	% ...subsumed                          : 755
0.34/0.86	% ...remaining for further processing  : 449
0.34/0.86	% Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 164
0.34/0.86	% Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
0.34/0.86	% Backward-subsumed                    : 4
0.34/0.86	% Backward-rewritten                   : 42
0.34/0.86	% Generated clauses                    : 3387
0.34/0.86	% ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2089
0.34/0.86	% ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
0.34/0.86	% Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
0.34/0.86	% Paramodulations                      : 3204
0.34/0.86	% Factorizations                       : 2
0.34/0.86	% NegExts                              : 0
0.34/0.86	% Equation resolutions                 : 180
0.34/0.86	% Disequality decompositions           : 0
0.34/0.86	% Total rewrite steps                  : 1278
0.34/0.86	% ...of those cached                   : 1079
0.34/0.86	% Propositional unsat checks           : 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional check models        : 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional clauses             : 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
0.34/0.86	%    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
0.34/0.86	%    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
0.34/0.86	%    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
0.34/0.86	%    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
0.34/0.86	% Current number of processed clauses  : 375
0.34/0.86	%    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 120
0.34/0.86	%    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
0.34/0.86	%    Negative unit clauses             : 6
0.34/0.86	%    Non-unit-clauses                  : 248
0.34/0.86	% Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1127
0.34/0.86	% ...number of literals in the above   : 2952
0.34/0.86	% Current number of archived formulas  : 0
0.34/0.86	% Current number of archived clauses   : 46
0.34/0.86	% Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14670
0.34/0.86	% Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13428
0.34/0.86	% Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 718
0.34/0.86	% Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1393
0.34/0.86	% Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
0.34/0.86	% BW rewrite match attempts            : 81
0.34/0.86	% BW rewrite match successes           : 44
0.34/0.86	% Condensation attempts                : 0
0.34/0.86	% Condensation successes               : 0
0.34/0.86	% Termbank termtop insertions          : 59174
0.34/0.86	% Search garbage collected termcells   : 9827
0.34/0.86	
0.34/0.86	% -------------------------------------------------
0.34/0.86	% User time                : 0.165 s
0.34/0.86	% System time              : 0.014 s
0.34/0.86	% Total time               : 0.179 s
0.34/0.86	% Maximum resident set size: 6380 pages
0.34/0.86	
0.34/0.86	% -------------------------------------------------
0.34/0.86	% User time                : 0.199 s
0.34/0.86	% System time              : 0.024 s
0.34/0.86	% Total time               : 0.222 s
0.34/0.86	% Maximum resident set size: 6144 pages
0.34/0.86	% E exiting
0.34/0.86	EOF